AFA Weekly logo

10 February 2021

With Greg Earl

Divides over Myanmar

Last Friday, the leaders of Indonesia and Malaysia proposed a special meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to discuss the military takeover in Myanmar.

Normally, special meetings would be initiated by the ASEAN chair – currently Brunei – which can be slow to act, as members do not traditionally interfere in one another’s internal affairs.

But Indonesian president Joko Widodo and Malaysian prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin apparently recognise that the coup in Myanmar represents an important challenge to the credibility of South-East Asian countries and their ability to resolve regional problems.

Nevertheless, a show of solidarity will be difficult, given that Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore have expressed concern about the coup, but Thailand, the Philippines and Cambodia have thus far tended to treat it as an internal affair.

All of these countries need to face up to the responsibilities that come with ASEAN taking a central role in Asian diplomacy. ASEAN members should lead efforts to ease the current tensions in Myanmar, which could become an impediment to further regional integration and prosperity.

Recently, Australia has placed more emphasis on ASEAN as the foundation stone of regional diplomacy and has backed this up with increased aid to improve governance and cross-border cooperation in parts of the region. This has strengthened Australia’s longstanding ties with South-East Asia.

The Morrison government should use these ties to encourage key countries with closer connections to Myanmar to respond more actively to the coup.

This will obviously require quiet diplomacy. But, as a close neighbour of South-East Asia, it is essential for Australia to take this step. In doing so, it can also play a role in explaining the region’s diplomatic processes to the wider world.


Pacific leadership brawl

The election of a new secretary-general for the Pacific Islands Forum has created tensions that are seriously challenging the ability of South Pacific countries to cooperate on pressing regional issues, including COVID-19, climate change, natural disasters and influence peddling by China and other external powers.

The election was an unusual five-way competition. Normally, the role is rotated between the three main groups of the region: Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia. The previous two secretaries-general were Melanesian and Polynesian.

Last week, Henry Puna, the former prime minster of the Cook Islands in Polynesia, was elected to the top job by nine votes to eight, beating out Gerald Zackios from the Marshall Islands in Micronesia.

Five Micronesian countries, led by Palau, now say they will leave the seventeen-member organisation because their interests are being ignored by larger South Pacific countries.

Pacific countries have been prone to financial scandals and crises, and internal political turmoil. The PIF plays an important role in providing a sense of purpose to the region, as well as some peer pressure that encourages better governance.

Australia is a member of the PIF and the largest provider of aid to many of its fellow members. As Australia is likely to be the main source of emergency financial and security assistance for the group, it has a vital interest in maintaining regional unity. But it appears to have been caught out by the severity of this dispute.

The break-up of PIF requires some quick cooperative diplomacy. Australia – alongside other key aid providers, including Japan and New Zealand – must broker a compromise which reassures the smaller Micronesian states that they are not being ignored.


Ageing Asia

In January, South Korea revealed that its population had declined for the first time in the country’s history.

This tipping point, brought forward by the pandemic, underlines how ageing is emerging as an important social and economic issue in Asia, despite the popular image of a demographic dividend in countries with a high population growth, such as the Philippines.

The population of South Korea – Asia’s fourth biggest economy – has been ageing at a faster rate than elsewhere in the region, principally due to a rapid decline in fertility.

The impact of ageing on the strategic and economic outlook in Asia needs to be taken into account in Australian thinking about the region.

Services related to aged care – medical, financial and otherwise – could become a faster-growing trade opportunity for Australian businesses than offshore education.

Countries with shrinking populations may be less prone to pursue territorial expansion and more likely to cooperate on shared economic challenges.

And Australia’s history of renewing its population through immigration should prove to be a soft-power asset, as South Korea and other countries look for more ways to grow their populations as they struggle to successfully implement baby bonuses and other pro-growth policies.


-

Want more insightful discussion on our place in the world? Subscribe to the print journal to have Australia’s best voices on foreign affairs in your mailbox three times a year.

Explore subscription options.

-
-
-

Why should Australia be concerned about rising tensions in the Taiwan Strait?

“Unlike his predecessors, Xi Jinping … is no longer prepared to leave unification of the mainland and Taiwan to future generations … Australia needs to pay attention to rising tensions in the Strait and prepare for another, more probable scenario: a protracted and intensive campaign by Beijing, using ‘all means short of war’, to force the Taiwanese leadership to start negotiating.” Linda Jakobson,China Matters

Short of war – how to keep US–Chinese confrontation from ending in calamity

“China will seek to achieve global economic dominance and regional military superiority over the United States without provoking direct conflict with Washington and its allies. Once it achieves superiority, China will then incrementally change its behaviour toward other states.” Kevin Rudd, Foreign Affairs

What does America think the rules-based order is for?

“[Australia’s] foreign and security policy should be geared towards encouraging the United States to think about the relationship with communist China not as an ideological contest or a struggle for supremacy, but as a permanent accommodation between two great powers in which China will have significant advantages.” Sam Roggeveen, The Interpreter (Lowy Institute)
-
-

Biden, Xi and the evolution of cooperation

“Biden and Xi appear to face the same dilemma: whether to be the first to extend an olive branch with the aim of stabilising bilateral relations in the short term and gaining an enduring strategic edge in the bilateral rivalry.” Minxin Pei, The Strategist (ASPI)

How US plans for first Quad summit could be first steps towards “mini-NATO” to counter Chinese influence

“It is not certain how far [the Quad] will develop, especially since India, the only member to share a land border with China, has reservations about the framework and has long maintained a non-aligned stance in diplomacy.” Liu Zhen, South China Morning Post
Free from Australian Foreign Affairs

Correspondence on “Party Faithful” by Anne-Marie Brady

“Despite the proliferation of cases linked to China’s intelligence agencies, very little is known about these agencies publicly. There are few researchers outside of government who specialise in this area. Accurate information is hard to come by, and even harder to unearth. The Chinese military’s Political Work Department Liaison Bureau – one of the Party’s most important interference and espionage agencies – doesn’t even have its own Wikipedia page.” Alex Joske, HERE

Read Anne-Marie Brady's response, HERE

-


Read past editions of AFA Weekly


Sign up to AFA Weekly to get each new edition in your inbox