AFA Monthly logo

1 December 2021

With Greg Earl

Pacific tensions

Australia is facing potential tensions in Melanesia over independence movements in New Caledonia and Bougainville, as well as unrest in the Solomons Islands, where Australian police and defence force personnel were deployed last week to aid peacekeeping efforts.

New Caledonia is due to hold its third and final vote on independence from France on 12 December, but the separatist camp is calling for the vote to be deferred due to the impact of COVID-19 on the indigenous Kanak people, who tend to favour independence.

The Morrison government faces a dilemma whatever happens. If New Caledonia rejects independence, it will reinforce the importance of France’s strategic role in the Pacific. But a pro-independence vote could leave Australia with another politically fragile neighbour in the region.

Meanwhile, following Bougainville’s 2019 pro-independence vote, consultations are underway for Papua New Guinea to transfer further powers to Bougainville by 2023 and full independence by 2027.

However, negotiations between the two governments, a requirement of the 2019 vote, have been set back by the pandemic. Within the PNG leadership, there are also signs of growing resistance to Bougainvillean independence. This is significant, as the independence referendum was non-binding and is still subject to ratification by the PNG parliament.

PNG prime minister James Marape has described Bougainvillean independence as a bigger challenge to Papua New Guinea than the pandemic, despite the devastating health outlook the country faces as a result of low vaccination rates. PNG governor-general Bob Dadae says the country could disintegrate if Bougainville leaves.

While the situation in the Solomon Islands is different, the turmoil it is experiencing underlines the risks of fragmentation that ethnically diverse Melanesian societies face. These tensions are fuelled by resource disputes, which can be exacerbated by foreign interference.

The Australian government wants to avoid another long-term deployment of troops to Melanesia, such as its 2003–17 Regional Assistance Mission to the Solomon Islands, but it seems likely that it will still need to play some role in mediating the region’s emerging political and economic disputes.

Indonesia steps out

Indonesia takes over the leadership of the G20 today in what will be a test of President Joko Widodo’s ability to manage high-level international diplomacy.

Last week, under the slogan “Recover Together, Recover Stronger”, his government announced three relatively straightforward priorities for the G20 in 2022: global health, energy transition and digital transformation.

Widodo, who has previously shown little interest in foreign relations, now has an unusual opportunity to raise his country’s international stature during his last two years in office.

Earlier this year, Widodo also played a leadership role in South-East Asia by opposing the military coup in Myanmar, and he is set to chair the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in 2023.

Indonesian leaders played a significant part in forming the international Non-Aligned Movement in the 1950s, but more recently the world’s fourth-most populous country and third-largest democracy is sometimes viewed as punching below its weight.

During a series of preliminary meetings with world leaders at the G20 Rome summit and the UN climate change conference in Glasgow, Widodo showed enthusiasm for turning this perception on its head. Indonesia has “to start building self-confidence, a sense of optimism as a leading nation”, he declared.

The Morrison government has offered whole-of-government administrative assistance to support Widodo’s G20 presidency and appears to see it as an opportunity to bolster relations between Indonesia and Australia.

But other countries may have the same idea, especially following Indonesia’s lukewarm response to the AUKUS submarine deal.

Only last week, France – possibly with an eye to Australia’s Indonesian ambitions – announced it would draw on its parallel leadership of the European Union in the first half of 2022 to work closely with Indonesia on the next G20 summit.

Offshore education

Australia is poised to teach more foreign students online and offshore under a ten-year plan to overhaul the international education sector, bringing it more into line with the needs of the domestic market.

The plan, released last week by federal education minister Alan Tudge, suggests that Australian institutions could remotely educate an extra 10 million foreign students over the next two decades.

From this month, the government will also allow foreign students back into the country in certain states, and it has offered some students work visa credits to compensate for asking them to study remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The government hopes that the plan will further ease tensions with universities, which were badly hit by COVID, with shutdowns slashing revenue in what was once the country’s fourth-biggest export sector.

But universities and private training organisations will also come under pressure to enrol fewer onshore students from the world’s two most populous countries – China and India – to reduce dependence on them and increase on-campus diversity.

Tudge said the government wants to see international education “flourish again”, but not at the expense of the Australian student experience. “This means that our public universities need to have a higher priority on diversity in their classrooms,” Tudge said.

Instead, there is an “enormous opportunity” to shift to “high-quality offshore courses”, said Tudge, noting that 58 per cent of the United Kingdom’s international students study offshore compared to 20 per cent of Australia’s international students.

Educating foreign students – mostly from Asia – has been a key part of Australia’s soft diplomacy since the introduction of the Colombo Plan in the 1950s, which saw Australian-educated students advancing to leadership roles in their home countries.

Skills shortages and economic considerations appear to be the main drivers of recent policy changes, but they will require careful management if the longstanding diplomatic benefits of educating foreign students is not lost – especially as Australia faces an increasingly uncertain regional security environment.


A free extract from “New Wave” by Aarti Betigeri

“Almost a decade ago, Melbourne artist Sapna Chandu wondered why chai – proper Indian-style masala chai – was nowhere to be found in Australian cafes, yet the dialled-down Western version, chai latte, was everywhere. It led her to conceptualise a world where India had overtaken Australia and had staged a cultural coup.”CONTINUE READING


Weekly round-up

Why there are no grand alliances in Asia

“At the moment few South-East Asian leaders view China as the primary threat – militarily or otherwise. There is no regional concurrence over a ‘China challenge’, nor that any one power is ideologically or morally superior.” Evan Laksmana, The Australian Financial Review [$]

Too soon to be waving the white flag on China

“The People’s Liberation Army is rapidly strengthening, but it is still a second-tier military. Chinese military journals are acutely focused on deficiencies in everything from stealth to jet engines to leadership failings and a lack of operational experience.” Peter Jennings, The Strategist (ASPI)

As Australia deploys troops and police, what now for Solomon Islands?

“The question of why this is happening involves a complex mix of domestic politics and geopolitical shifts. It is way too simple to say that this is because Solomon Islands ‘switched’ allegiances from Taiwan to China in late 2019.” Tess Newton Cain, The Conversation


ASEAN responses to AUKUS security dynamic

“AUKUS lifts constraints on China from sharing its sophisticated military technologies. While China’s unlikely to establish formal alliances, it may well be tempted to set-up AUKUS-like defence arrangements with other countries in the region.” Dino Patti Djalal, East Asia Forum

New Zealand – no longer Australia’s Pacific security partner?

“We might be in a period when as often as not Wellington uses its strong Pacific connections to emphasise trans-Tasman dissimilarities rather than unity.” Robert Ayson, The Interpreter (Lowy Institute)

The Reckoning out now

The Reckoning: How #MeToo is Changing Australia, by Jess Hill

In 2021, Australia saw rage and revelation, as #MeToo powered an insurgency against sexism and sexual violence. From once isolated survivors to political staffers, women everywhere were refusing to keep men’s secrets.

This is a powerful essay about shame, secrecy and, most of all, a revolutionary movement for accountability.CONTINUE READING



Share AFA Weekly with a friend.
And subscribe to Australian Foreign Affairs, today.

Read past editions of AFA Monthly

Sign up to AFA Monthly to get each new edition in your inbox