AFA Monthly logo

29 January 2020

With Jonathan Pearlman

Wuhan tests trust in China

In 2003, a semi-retired surgeon in China, Jiang Yanyong, wrote a letter to the nation’s leaders, revealing that authorities had been covering up the extent of the SARS epidemic. Chinese authorities responded by sacking the minister of health and mayor of Beijing. They then put Jiang under police surveillance before detaining him.

Five years later, six children died and 300,000 became ill from contaminated infant milk formula. More than twenty Chinese firms had used the toxic chemical melamine to inflate the protein content of their product. Company staff were executed or jailed, food safety regulators were sacked, and the government was accused of suppressing the scandal until after the Beijing Olympics.

As China faces another public health crisis, the credibility of the state is once again being tested. Australia and countries around the world are closely watching China’s response to the outbreak of the Wuhan coronavirus to determine whether the current leadership can be trusted to deal with it transparently.

The initial handling of the epidemic largely resembled that of previous crises. Local authorities seemingly tried to contain reports about the virus by detaining people for spreading rumours and concealing the number of known cases.

But then President Xi Jinping stepped in. His intervention appeared to lead to the lockdown of Wuhan and other cities, effectively quarantining about 56 million people. A shutdown on this scale is, as the World Health Organization put it, “new to science”.

The crisis is demonstrating the extent of Xi’s power as the head of a centralised, increasingly authoritarian state. But it is also revealing its limitations. Information is still being tightly controlled. Chinese media has downplayed the situation, probably to avoid public panic. And it is impossible to know whether reports about the number of cases identified are accurate. The crisis is likely to further damage trust in a hierarchical system that leaves local officials fearful of delivering bad news to their superiors.

However, there are signs that progress has been made since the SARS epidemic. There was no prolonged cover-up, especially after Beijing became involved. And, from the outset, Chinese scientists and health officials shared information about the virus with the World Health Organization and other international experts.

The current epidemic will test the political support in Beijing for Xi, who has already faced dissent over China’s economic slowdown and the protests in Hong Kong. But the Chinese response is also of global interest.

China’s increasingly mobile population and crucial role in world trade meant the virus was quick to spread abroad. Australia, for instance, has direct flights to Wuhan and is one of several countries outside China that have recorded cases of infection.

The outbreak is also having global economic consequences. The spread of SARS, which left about 800 people dead, caused losses of about US$18 billion in the region. The current crisis may be more consequential. China is now much wealthier and more enmeshed in world trade. In Australia, China’s ban on overseas tour groups is set to affect about 25 per cent of Australia’s visitors from China, its largest tourist market. More than 1.4 million Chinese tourists visited Australia in the year preceding September 2019, up from around 200,000 during the year of the SARS outbreak. 

This epidemic will also affect ties between China and the world. Trust is a vital ingredient in handling foreign affairs, particularly when dealing with a country whose leader holds so much power. In recent years, a lack of trust in China has severely damaged ties between Australia and its largest trading partner. It has led to Australia’s refusal to sign an extradition treaty with China and to allow Huawei to build its 5G network. It has also prompted tighter foreign investment and interference rules.

This outbreak is, above all, a human tragedy. But the handling of the crisis is a crucial concern for countries, such as Australia, whose fates are so dependent on determining whether Xi’s China is a partner they can trust.


It’s time for Southeast Asia to stand together against China – with Indonesia leading the way

“China and Indonesia have been facing off over the sovereignty of waters around Jakarta’s Riau Islands … Instead of building a bridge to Jakarta at a time when the United States appears adrift in Asia, China is alienating what could otherwise be an important partner.” Ankit PandaSouth China Morning Post

Japan vs South Korea — the “other trade war” complicating East Asian geopolitics

“From China’s viewpoint, the scenario seems to be a win-win ... If talks are unsuccessful, and the dispute continues, South Korea will be even more reliant on trade with China, drifting closer to it and perhaps further from the U.S. alliance system in East Asia.” Sartaj SinghThe Geopolitics

In India, the link between sexual violence and economic slowdown

“Just nine other countries have a lower share of working women … There is also a very strong likelihood that the threat of sexual violence is keeping women inside the home – whether by choice or at the behest of family members.” Aarti Betigeri, The Interpreter (Lowy Institute)


The persecuted Rohingya now have legal protection, but will it amount to anything?

“The likelihood that the architects of the genocide – chief among them Min Aung Hlaing, head of Myanmar’s military – will face trial is slim … The [International Court of Justice] ruling is a bright point in an otherwise woeful international response to the internment of Rohingya and the organised violence against them.” Francis WadeThe Guardian

Keeping the Australian defence force in the climate-change fight

“Today, we have the bizarre situation where the (normally) unpaid volunteers at the bushfire front line are being supported by the salaried professionals of the ADF. It should be the other way around. Australia’s disaster response needs to be from professionals first and mainly, complemented by unpaid volunteers as appropriate.” Peter Layton, The Strategist (ASPI)

Free from Australian Foreign Affairs

History hasn’t ended – how to handle China

“We have never had to manage a relationship as important as the one we have with China, with a country so different in its language, culture, history and values. Nor one with an Asian state so confident, and possessing so many dimensions of power. Japan may have been the world’s second-largest economy, but in strategic terms it was a client of the United States.” Allan Gyngell, HERE



While Australians should remain alert, they should not be alarmed.

Scott Morrison, Prime Minister (Australia)

It has not yet become a global health emergency — it may yet become one.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General (WHO)

We must step up the centralized and united leadership under the party central.

Xi Jinping, President (China)

Sources: Twitter, YouTube, The New York Times

Read past editions of AFA Monthly

Sign up to AFA Monthly to get each new edition in your inbox