AFA Weekly logo

21 October 2020

With Greg Earl

Don’t forget NZ

Jacinda Ardern won a strong majority in New Zealand’s election on Saturday and can now choose to run the country without making concessions to a coalition partner.

After receiving acclaim for her handling of a series of crises in her first term, she faces a different test: leading the country out of a COVID-19 recession that is deeper than Australia’s.

New Zealand is Australia’s most integrated economic partner, thanks to the free trade agreement they signed in 1983, and also its closest security partner, connected by a web of alliances and shared interests.

When Ardern joined a meeting of Australia’s national cabinet in May, it prompted some to reflect on how New Zealand could have joined the Australian Federation at one point. But several months later, New Zealand and some Australian states have resisted joining a full trans-Tasman travel bubble, free of quarantine restrictions.

Both national governments should be working to overcome this resistance. A travel bubble would allow them to take advantage of an easy source of economic growth while other restrictions on international travel remain in place. 

They should then seek new areas of cooperation that would benefit their respective recovery efforts. This could also assist with Australia’s foreign policy agenda.

New Zealand has a deeper and more consistent history of engagement with South Pacific countries, which Australia could draw on to implement its important Pacific “step-up” policy.

New Zealand has also managed to make decisions on China – in areas such as telecommunications, foreign influence and investment – without the bluntness that has at times characterised Canberra’s approach.


China’s trade silence

Chinese buyers of Australian coal and cotton have reportedly been encouraged to source those products elsewhere.

Reports on the trade limits first surfaced from within the industries themselves, and it seems that Beijing has not informed Canberra of any official directives it may have given to importers.

This situation is significantly different from the direct trade disputes that occurred between Australia and China earlier this year, when China placed bans on selected beef exporters for failing to meet export requirements and pursued anti-dumping investigations into Australian barley and wine.

It presents Canberra with a new and more complicated dilemma, as federal ministers are currently not able to directly talk with their Chinese counterparts.

Even in normal times, it would be hard for Canberra to deal with reports that the Chinese government had informally discouraged imports of Australian products. 

While some fear that China is targeting Australian products for political reasons, other explanations are possible. For example, China’s recent promise to become carbon neutral by 2060 means its need for Australian coal will eventually decline. Beijing is also trying to become a more self-sufficient food producer.

The difficulty of interpreting the current developments makes it even more important for Australia to revive communication with China, whether via ministerial contact or informal back channels.

Despite an increasingly obvious campaign of broad economic coercion on China’s part, the Australian government has sought to treat each trade setback as an individual case.

This is a sensible approach, because it may allow Australian exporters to resolve some of these issues by seeking support from Chinese customers who value their products. It will also allow certain cases to be arbitrated by the World Trade Organization disputes process, which China still supports.


Pacific dealings

A new free trade agreement between Australia and Pacific island countries will come into force in two months, after the Cook Islands became the eighth signatory to formally approve it last week.

The Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations Plus was negotiated three years ago, but some smaller countries have required time to prepare for its ratification.

The agreement aligns with Australia’s policy of greater engagement in the Pacific to combat rising Chinese diplomatic and economic activity there. It also reflects Australia’s new focus on promoting development through measures like the Pacific guest-worker program rather than through traditional aid projects alone.

However, its aims have been undermined, to an extent, by comments from the government that focused on the potential benefits to Australian exporters. Such messaging is not surprising, but will only make small nations more concerned that the deal is tilted in favour of the region’s largest country. The government needs to explain to voters that Australia has a national interest in Pacific countries becoming more economically sustainable.


-

Want more insightful discussion on our place in the world? Subscribe to the print journal to have Australia’s best voices on foreign affairs in your mailbox three times a year.

Explore subscription options.

-
-
-

Australia returns to the Malabar exercise

“This year’s Malabar will likely have the effect of raising expectations for the Quad going forward. For instance, Australia’s potential non-participation next year could be seen as a step back.” Ankit Panda,The Diplomat

International economic cooperation after the pandemic

“There is no going back to a pre-pandemic or pre-Trumpian status quo ante … To deal with a future in which there is a deficit of global leadership and in which US–China strategic competition is a structural feature … countries with compatible interests will coalesce around specific issues to form ad hoc, domain-specific and fluid coalitions.” Bilahari Kausikan, Australian Outlook (AIIA)

Senator Abetz’s loyalty test

“If he truly cared about the safety of members of the Chinese Australian community, he wouldn’t have persisted in asking them to publicly denounce the Chinese government. Interestingly, the behaviour at the hearing mirrored what the Chinese Communist Party does in its numerous political campaigns, including, most famously, the Cultural Revolution.” Yun Jiang, Inside Story

-
-

The dangers of excessive foreign policy zeal

“If the Chinese suggest even obliquely that they are interested in lowering the temperature – as they have recently … we should think about their significance. Responding favourably in these circumstances is not appeasement but engagement.” John McCarthy, Asialink

Keeping West Papua on the agenda

“In a region more inclined to fragment than to coalesce, the argument that a free West Papua would be a stronger bulwark on Australia’s northern border is a canny line.” Dan McGarry, The Interpreter (Lowy Institute)

Free from Australian Foreign Affairs

Blind spot – why Australia needs a South-East Asia step-up

“Some foreign policy and development specialists argue that Australia’s lack of substantial support for South-East Asia, particularly Indonesia, during the pandemic reflects a deeper, long-running failure to strengthen ties with countries across the region. Despite Australia’s professed commitment to engage with its neighbours, many feel the reality doesn’t match the rhetoric.” Karen Middleton, HERE

-

GIVEAWAY

Win an ebook copy of Friends, Allies and Enemies: Asia’s Shifting Loyalties!

The tenth issue of Australian Foreign Affairs examines the alliances, blocs and rivalries emerging across the Asia-Pacific as nations adjust to the changing balance of power.

Friends, Allies and Enemies: Asia’s Shifting Loyalties considers Australia’s diplomatic options as loyalties shift in an increasingly turbulent region.

Featuring Hugh White, Rory Medcalf, Karen Middleton, Patrick Lawrence, Allan Behm, Primrose Riordan, Timothy J. Lynch, Renée Fry-McKibbin and Sophie Chao; PLUS Correspondence on AFA9: Spy vs Spy from John Hewson, Jenny McAllister, Lesley Seebeck and more.

There are five copies up for grabs. CLICK HERE TO ENTER

-


Read past editions of AFA Weekly


Sign up to AFA Weekly to get each new edition in your inbox