AFA Weekly logo

28 October 2020

With Greg Earl

The US election and Australia

The US presidential election next Tuesday is seen by many Americans as the most consequential in living memory. It will determine how the country responds to its current health and economic crises, and whether Donald Trump’s populism and “America First” world view are aberrations or new norms.

But the election may be almost as important for Australia, whose foreign policies still revolve around a predictable and consistent United States. Its outcome will directly affect five key policy areas: trade, China, multilateralism, climate and ties with Asia. 

 

Trade

Although the United States has become a less significant trading partner for Australia due to higher economic growth in Asia, it remains central to the global trading system. Australia has so far avoided being the target of US tariffs, but it may be affected by Trump’s recent efforts to undermine the World Trade Organization. Since the United States withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Australia has joined Japan in keeping the TPP alive. However, Australia would benefit from the United States rejoining the agreement, which enables a more open Asian economy and does so without China’s involvement. Whether this could happen is unclear – the Democratic party base may be just as opposed to the TPP as the Trump administration. 

 

China

The election won’t change the United States’ fundamental fear of China as an economic competitor. Although the spotlight has been on recent US–China conflicts over cybersecurity and the South China Sea, the relationship had already soured due to the impact of China’s rise on American manufacturing jobs. But the outcome of the election won’t be without consequence, as Trump and Biden have distinct approaches to managing China: a returned Trump administration might make sudden opportunistic deals with China, while a Biden administration might engage in long and intense internecine struggle over China policy. Australia has a much larger stake in continued economic cooperation with China, and it will remain squeezed by its different relationships with these two major powers.

 

Multilateralism

Opinion polls show that only a narrow majority of Americans support the deep international engagement that characterised US foreign policy in the late twentieth century. It therefore remains unclear how much of the country’s former multilateral spirit can be rekindled now that the United States has withdrawn from the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, the Paris Agreement and UNESCO. Scott Morrison dabbled in some Trumpian criticism of “negative globalism” last year, but his government has since recognised the importance of multilateral institutions in managing international issues like the coronavirus pandemic and health care in the Pacific. Australia would benefit if the United States came to a similar realisation and directed its efforts towards strengthening and improving these sometimes bureaucratic and politicised global bodies.

 

Climate

If Biden becomes president, his US$2 trillion climate plan could be the biggest symbolic shift in international policy to result from the election. And coupled with China’s commitment to be carbon neutral by 2060, it could amount to a radical reduction of carbon emissions. It might also lead to China and the United States cooperating on this existential issue, even if they remain competitors on other matters. This would be a double-edged sword for the Australian government, which could face trade sanctions and pressure to sharply reduce its own emissions.

 

Ties with Asia

Australia’s last foreign policy white paper and strategic defence update based Australia’s long-term outlooks on an assumption that the United States will return to a more traditional approach to engagement in Asia. If Biden is elected, this may or may not come to pass. While Biden is a traditionalist, the Democratic Party is split between those who support Obama-era policies like the “pivot to Asia”, which sought to strengthen America’s bilateral relations in the region, and reformers who prefer a tougher approach to protecting human rights and defending America’s technological leadership. However, Biden could at least be expected to attend Asian summits and listen, which would be a big step forward after the erratic approach to such events in the Trump years. It would also give Australia a useful partner in the room.

 


-

Want more insightful discussion on our place in the world? Subscribe to the print journal to have Australia’s best voices on foreign affairs in your mailbox three times a year.

Explore subscription options.

-
-
-

Trump goes with his gut, even if the world beyond the United States goes belly up

“The consensus in Washington is that the United States will continue its confrontation of China no matter who wins the presidency; [John] Bolton says we shouldn’t assume so. ‘If Xi calls him after the election and says “Congratulations on your victory and we think you’re a great guy”, Trump’s perfectly capable of doing a 180-degree turn.’” Peter Hartcher,The Sydney Morning Herald

Japan and Australia wary of China as RCEP talks enter last stretch

“With economies suffering historic contractions due to the virus, RCEP is now seen as a catalyst for a reboot … With India, Australia and Japan intent on pursuing their arrangement in parallel, the road looks relatively clear for an RCEP accord in November.” Shotaro Tani & Takako Gakuto, Nikkei Asia

Loyalty tests make Australia weaker, not stronger

“The line of questioning on display at the parliamentary inquiry plays right into Beijing’s narrative that individuals the world over are liable to do Beijing’s bidding based on the mere fact of their background.” Natasha Kassam & Darren Lim, The Interpreter (Lowy Institute)

-
-

ASEAN is failing on the South China Sea issue

“As China continues its militarisation of the vital seaway, most South-East Asian nations remain mired in their own problems.” Phar Kim Beng, The Diplomat

Forecast 2025 – China adjusts course

“Achieving [positive growth] outcomes will require trade-offs, in this case a China that will likely redouble on domestic priorities and moderate its appetite for global adventurism.” Damien Ma, Macro Polo (Paulson Institute)

Free from Australian Foreign Affairs

Great expectations – can Australia depend on its neighbours?

“The Australian government’s 2020 Defence Strategic Update, released in July, marks an important change in direction ... Australia will seek its security principally as part of a coalition of Asian countries. The government plainly hopes that this coalition will be led by the United States, but that is not taken for granted. We no longer repose our trust in America alone, and if America fails us then we will look not to ourselves but to our Asian neighbours.” Hugh White, HERE

-
-

Updates to our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Dear reader,

Your privacy is very important to us. We’d like to let you know that we are updating our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions (collectively, “Policies”).

We’re making these updates to clarify our terms and to provide you with information about our new products, features and subscriptions on offer. These changes are effective as of 21 October 2020.

If you would like to learn more about these Policies, you can find our updated Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions here.

Please familiarise yourself with these updates; no further action is required and you do not need to contact us. By continuing to use our website or receive our products and services, you are accepting the updated Policies.

If you do not agree, you can choose to discontinue using the products and cancel your subscriptions and/or close your account. Please see our cancellation policy in our Terms & Conditions.

If you have any questions, please contact us.
 



Read past editions of AFA Weekly


Sign up to AFA Weekly to get each new edition in your inbox